Category Archives: Judicial branch
-
The 20th Judicial District (Boulder) Judicial Performance Commission held a public hearing May 15, 2018 to receive comments about judges. They’re not required to hold a hearing. And after recent statutory revisions, public hearings aren’t recommended anymore. The judges up for retention this year are: District Court Judges Thomas Mulvahill and Norma Sierra, and County Court Judges David Archuleta and Elizabeth Brodsky.
May 20, 2018 by Lulu
The commission held a public hearing on May 15, 2018, from 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. in Courtroom F at the …
Continue reading -
Our concerns with Colorado Rules of Probate Procedure, Rule and Form amendments are moot until Justices follow the rules, and mechanisms for accountability and meaningful redress exist.
November 17, 2017 by Lulu
To Cheryl Stevens, Active Clerk of The Supreme Court Post this Public Comment on The Colorado Supreme Court Page on the proposed amendments …
Continue reading -
According to audits from Colorado’s state auditor, the judicial branch hasn’t been doing a good job on probate cases for 11 years. At the request of former State Senator Laura Woods, an audit was performed this year regarding public administrators. But this is clear: We now have 2 reports from the state auditor criticizing the judicial branch’s handling of probate cases. The audit states that the judicial branch failed to keep fundamental data to oversee the public administrator function.
October 1, 2017 by Lulu
The Judicial Integrity Project Kudos to the state auditor for criticizing Colorado’s judicial branch.According to audits from Colorado’s state auditor, …
Continue reading -
Join us Wednesday night on F.A.C.E.U.S. with Robin and Lulu Host Peter Coulter JUDICIAL CORRUPTION to the 3rd power. We have some important information on What’s Happening In Colorado. We have a bill waiting to be signed by the Governor that will make justice for pro-se litigants impossible starting in 2019. If someone can’t stop this; I believe the only solution is to get out of the state.
May 24, 2017 by Lulu
Join us Wednesday night on F.A.C.E.U.S. with Robin and Lulu Host Peter Coulter JUDICIAL CORRUPTION to the 3rd power. We …
Continue reading -
Colorado Attorneys Generals office opposes open record reform. State Sen. John Kefalas, D-Fort Collins, said he is willing to work with the AG’s office, unless they are “just against more transparency and open government.”
December 7, 2016 by Lulu
State Sen. John Kefalas, D-Fort Collins, listens during a hearing in the 2016 legislative session. The state Attorney General’s office …
Continue reading -
The State Commission on Judicial Performance seeks citizen’s input on Colorado’s Judicial Performance Evaluation program. This input will help guide and pursue legislation to renew the program’s governing statute (CRS 13-5.5-101 et. seq.) which sunsets in 2019. Come join F.A.C.E.U.S. advocates to speak out on the retention of judges in Colorado.
November 14, 2016 by Lulu
Here are the Dates for the Public to Come Speak about the Retention of Judges. I got this off of …
Continue reading -
Massive Campaign Finance Violation Filed! October 26 at 1:07pm Following is a personal Registry of Action concerning the Campaign Finance lawsuit filed against the Colorado Judiciary including its’ 3600 employees, members and 306 Judges, Chief Justice of the Colorado Supreme Court Nancy Rice, individually and in her official position as head of the Colorado Supreme Court Administrative Division. Our campaign to curtail the corruption in the Judiciary asks that you take the Pledge and vote DO NOT RETAIN for all 109 judges until the Judiciary becomes 100% Transparent and Accountable.
October 30, 2016 by Lulu
Massive Campaign Finance Violation Filed!!! Court November 4th, 2016 9am contact info@faceus.org if you need more info or contact transparentcourts@gmail.com. …
Continue reading -
Shouldn’t we expect the judicial branch to follow the law? Unfortunately, that doesn’t appear to be the case. The state commission hasn’t complied with the law because it didn’t send surveys to all the groups it is required to send surveys. The number of Coloradans affected by the rulings of these judges: 5.356 million. If you want to change this situation, vote “Shall NOT be retained” on judges.
October 8, 2016 by Lulu
The Judicial Integrity Project Shouldn’t we expect the judicial branch to follow the law? Unfortunately, that doesn’t appear to be …
Continue reading